Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX vs T01 Adventurer Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 74880
QAR 123402
QAR 72000
QAR 118706
QAR 1008
QAR 1661
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4435
4705
1695
1895
1705
1936
2685
2860
213
/
/
2150
/
17"
/
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
12.5
9.1
45
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3-inch
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
103 BHP
248 BHP
135
410
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)