Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 150821
QAR 150821
QAR 145103
QAR 145103
QAR 2030
QAR 2030
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
3
/
2360
/
16
/
5915
/
1950
/
2280
/
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
/
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
/
Diesel
/
174
/
450
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
