Renault Trafic 2017 Passenger Van vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 14.35
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9.23
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 100.45
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 64.57
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 430.5
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 276.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 5237.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3367.12
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Engine / Motor
160
/
4
4
Dimensions
8 Seater
8 Seater
5182
4715
1904
1800
1952
1985
3498
2985
2000
/
Fuel Economy
7.4
11.4
/
75
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Manual
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Diesel
120 BHP
88 BHP
190
192
Technologies
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)

.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)



.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)



