Transit Van T350 HR vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
150
160
4
4
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
16
/
/
1880
/
2285
/
3110
/
9800
/
5380
Fuel Economy
/
9.5
/
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
10AT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/65 R16C
/
235/65 R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
299
158 BHP
542
243
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
