Honda Accord

عبدالله رامي

13 hours ago

I fell in love with the design at first sight—retro but not outdated. It really gives off that classic old-school Honda vibe, especially the rear. Some people don’t like the small rear logo, but to me, that’s exactly what makes it charming. The interior feels basic by today’s standards—lots of plastic, probably around 60%. Even a bit of leather would’ve helped. One thing that really bothered me was the insulation material under the seats—it’s made from recycled cotton, and the smell on delivery day was... not great. Space-wise, it’s solid. I’m 175 cm tall and felt comfortable in the driver’s seat, and the rear seats are roomy too. It’s a 5-meter-long B-segment sedan after all. Features are a bit underwhelming. The mid-trim doesn’t even come with parking sensors, let alone a 360 camera. If you want them, you’ll need to visit aftermarket shops—Japanese cars are really keeping that industry alive. As for performance, it’s average by 2025 standards. Can’t compete with EVs, but decent for a gas car. Handling is surprisingly solid—it corners with confidence. Fuel consumption depends on how you drive. If you're always in S mode, 10L/100km or more is totally normal.

سعيد أحمد

13 hours ago

I decided to change my car after six and a half years, and after comparing the Camry, Altima, and Accord, I chose the Honda Accord because it combines style, reliability, and good resale value. The Camry felt underpowered, and although the Altima was great, its sales numbers are relatively low. I’ve driven the Accord for 900 km so far, and fuel consumption is between 6.6 and 7.3 L/100 km — which is excellent. Rear seat space is also very generous. As for the downsides: tire noise is noticeable, the low-beam headlights are weak, the infotainment screen sometimes freezes, there's only one USB port in the front, and the seats don’t have memory settings. Overall, I’m satisfied — it’s a practical, fuel-efficient car that suits daily use perfectly.