Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) vs Shine E1 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 101045
QAR 51475
QAR 97225
QAR 49475
QAR 1360
QAR 693
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 215.25
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 215.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195 km/h
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
4885 mm
4670 mm
1840 mm
1812 mm
1445 mm
1490 mm
2824 mm
2680 mm
493 L
454 L
/
16
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
14
60 L
50 L
14.9 Km/L
14 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
7
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Wheels/brakes
/
205/55 R16
/
205/55 R16
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
204 BHP
123 BHP
243 Nm
158 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
ECO/ SPORT
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
