Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 118126
QAR 117460
QAR 113627
QAR 113000
QAR 1590
QAR 1581
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 14.35
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 100.45
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 430.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 5237.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
65 L
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
5915 mm
1950
1950 mm
1990
2280 mm
3210
3860 mm
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
options.9,800 L
/
800 L
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
7.4 Km/L
70
65 L
/
7.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
277
277 BHP
351
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Motor
/
360 Nm
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
