Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 118126
QAR 118126
QAR 113627
QAR 113627
QAR 1590
QAR 1590
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
6
/
Dimensions
3
/
2155
/
16
/
5265
/
1950
/
1990
/
3210
/
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
/
277
/
351
/
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
