Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 175111
QAR 245843
QAR 168455
QAR 236511
QAR 2357
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.13 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 13.33
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 93.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 413.08
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 349.53
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4863.63
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
6
6
3956 cc
3490 cc
Japanese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
3 Doors
5 Doors
4235 mm
5115 mm
1840 mm
1980 mm
1910 mm
1920 mm
2310 mm
2890 mm
700 L
1004 L
290 m
221 m
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
90 L
110 L
8 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
4
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
4.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
228 BHP
271 BHP
360 Nm
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
