Land Cruiser Hybrid VXR vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Price Comparison
QAR 401797
QAR 440286
QAR 386585
QAR 423626
QAR 5408
QAR 5926
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 63
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 270
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 330
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3285
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
3498
/
GCC
/
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5005
4922 mm
1980
2004 mm
1940
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10.9
9.5 Km/L
98
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front, Rear And Third Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
11
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
JBL
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
4.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
530 BHP
790
750 Nm
24 V, DUAL VVT-I, V35A-FTS
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
