Sportage Smartstream 2.0L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 100067
QAR 139230
QAR 96233
QAR 133947
QAR 1347
QAR 1874
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 307.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4515 mm
4760 mm
865 mm
1930 mm
1650 mm
1927 mm
2680 mm
2750 mm
591 L
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
54 L
75 L
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
152 BHP
224 BHP
192 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
