City 1.5L DX 2025 vs K3 1.6L LX STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 70054
QAR 72586
QAR 67370
QAR 69830
QAR 943
QAR 977
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1490 cc
1.6 Liter
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4545
1748 mm
1765
1476 mm
1475
2650 mm
/
/
16
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
/
40 L
50
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Front & Back Warning System
/
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Transmission
Automatic
6 Speed AT
/
6 Speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
/
MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
185/65 R15
/
185/65 R15
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
121 BHP
145 Nm
/
/
1.6 Liter, 1,591cc, 4 Cylinders
/
121 Hp / 6,300 rpm
/
15.8 Kg.m / 4,850 rpm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
