City 1.5L DX 2025 vs New H9 2.0T Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 70054
QAR 241989
QAR 67370
QAR 232845
QAR 943
QAR 3257
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 184.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
5137
1748 mm
1904
1476 mm
1493
2650 mm
3060
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
17.9
40 L
62
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
241 HP
145 Nm
380
/
4 cylinders in-line, turbo charged
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
