Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
QAR 75400
QAR 77480
QAR 72500
QAR 74500
QAR 1015
QAR 1043
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 184.5
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4.480
1765
1.850
1535
1.650
2570
2.670
240
515
/
✓
Fuel Economy
15.4
12.5
48
62
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
148 BHP
153 BHP
192
192
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
