MG5 1.5L CVT COM vs Honda City 2020 1.5L LX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and youthful design
- Fuel efficiency
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Average engine performance
- Sound insulation is limited
- Interior materials of medium quality
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
QAR 56169
QAR 57200
QAR 54041
QAR 54999
QAR 756
QAR 770
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.3
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 44.1
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 58.8
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 195.3
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 260.4
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2299.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3066
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
11.5
Engine / Motor
184
190
4
4
1495 mL
/
Middle East
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1215
/
16
✓
4
/
4607
4.455
1818
1.695
1489
1.475
2680
2.600
406
510
Fuel Economy
16.8
13.3
45
40
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
3.5
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
PU Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front airbag, Front side airbags
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson strut
/
Torsion beam
/
Electronic power steering
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
205/55 R16
/
205/55 R16
/
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
4
/
DOHC
/
110 BHP
118 BHP
81
/
4500
/
140
145
6000
/
Euro 6
/
Motor
81
/
110
/
Transverse
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
