MG7 2.0T COM vs Camry E HEV Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
QAR 106987
QAR 107656
QAR 102931
QAR 103577
QAR 1440
QAR 1449
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.04 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 4.1
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 28.7
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 127.1
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 1496.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
/
4
/
1990 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1650
/
19
16
4 Doors
4
4884
4920
1889
1840
1447
1445
2778
/
/
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
16.9
27.7
65
50
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Manual
Interior
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
10.25
7
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Fabric
Digital
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
Driver, Front Passenger, Side & Curtain
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
✓
/
9-Speed Automatic
Electronic Continuous Variable Transmission (E-CVT)
/
8
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Mcpherson
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
245/40 R19
205/65R16
245/40 R19
205/65R16
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
261
226 BHP
405 Nm
221
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
