Okavango 2025 GF 4WD vs RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
QAR 123484
QAR 124667
QAR 118820
QAR 119932
QAR 1662
QAR 1678
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.04 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 4.1
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 28.7
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 307.5
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 123
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 1496.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4860 mm
4600 mm
1910 mm
1855 mm
1770 mm
1685 mm
2825 mm
2660 mm
257 L
/
194 mm
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
24.4 Km/L
52 L
55 L
10 Km/L
24.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
PVC Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
None
4
4
218
203 BHP
325 Nm
342 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
