CarteaCompare CarsRenault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

Renault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.14 L/KM

0.1 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 14.35

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 10.25

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 100.45

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 71.75

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 430.5

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 307.5

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 5237.75

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 3741.25

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Engine / Motor

160

160

4

4

Dimensions

8 Seater

3 Seater

5182

4695

1904

1695

1952

1980

3498

2570

2000

/

Fuel Economy

7.4

9.9

/

70

Interior

/

/

Safety

/

Transmission

Manual

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Engine

2.0 L

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

120 BHP

158 BHP

190

243

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Renault | Renault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

Renault | Renault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

Renault | Renault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Renault | Renault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

Renault | Renault Trafic 2016 Passenger Van

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Renault Related Car

Toyota Related Car