Traveller vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 154380
QAR 150821
QAR 148500
QAR 145103
QAR 2078
QAR 2030
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
Dimensions
7
3
5300
5915
1920
1950
1890
2280
6000
/
/
2360
/
16
/
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
Fuel Economy
/
12.6 Km/L
/
70
Comfort
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
8
/
2
Transmission
Automatic
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.8
Gasoline
Diesel
120
174
88
/
3500
/
300
450
1750
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
