X5 M50i xDrive vs Land Cruiser Hybrid VXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 440286
QAR 401797
QAR 423626
QAR 386585
QAR 5926
QAR 5408
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 63
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 341
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 279
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3285
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
/
6
/
3498
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4922 mm
5005
2004 mm
1980
1745 mm
1940
2975 mm
/
645 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.5 Km/L
10.9
83 L
98
9.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
Front, Rear And Third Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
11
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
JBL
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
3.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
530 BHP
457 BHP
750 Nm
790
/
24 V, DUAL VVT-I, V35A-FTS
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
