ZS 1.3T LUX vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Price Comparison
QAR 79860
QAR 82534
QAR 76796
QAR 79368
QAR 1075
QAR 1111
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.3
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 44.1
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 58.8
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 195.3
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 260.4
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2299.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3066
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
193 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4355 mm
1809
1810 mm
1653
1625 mm
2585
2670 mm
359/1166
358 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
12.5 Km/L
45
63 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Virtual Cluster
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Curtain Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6
/
6AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
160 BHP
150 BHP
120
/
230
197 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
