03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
QAR 120361
QAR 101045
QAR 115801
QAR 97225
QAR 1620
QAR 1360
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.48
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.48
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 45.33
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 45.33
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 200.73
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 200.73
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2363.38
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2363.38
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
195 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4697
4885 mm
1843
1840 mm
1448
1445 mm
2730
2824 mm
/
4 Doors
/
493 L
Fuel Economy
14.3
14.9 Km/L
/
60 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
front row seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
265 BHP
204 BHP
380
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
