09 Hyper Pro vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 171030
QAR 245843
QAR 164550
QAR 236511
QAR 2302
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
215
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5042
5115 mm
1977
1980 mm
1780
1920 mm
2984
2890 mm
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
12.7
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
254 BHP
271 BHP
350
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
