212 Adventure vs Tucson Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
QAR 123402
QAR 90707
QAR 118706
QAR 87234
QAR 1661
QAR 1221
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9.23
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 64.57
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 349.53
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 285.97
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3367.12
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1596 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2150
/
4705
4500 mm
1895
1865 mm
1936
1650 mm
2860
2680 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
210 m
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
4 Doors
/
620 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
11 Km/L
80
54 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248 BHP
177 BHP
410
264 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
