Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) vs Peugeot 301 2013 1.6L VTi Active Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 101045
TBD
QAR 97225
TBD
QAR 1360
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195 km/h
188
/
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4885 mm
4442
1840 mm
1953
1445 mm
1466
2824 mm
2652
493 L
640
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
15.4
60 L
50
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
204 BHP
115 BHP
243 Nm
150
Technologies
/
✓
