Captiva LS vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 78380
TBD
QAR 75399
TBD
QAR 1055
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 403
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4745
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
1051L
500
/
4385
/
1875
/
1850
/
2560
Fuel Economy
/
7.7
/
69
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2 Front and sides
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.4
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
184 BHP
/
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
/
✓
