Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
TBD
QAR 116420
TBD
QAR 111996
TBD
QAR 1567
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 317.75
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 222.43
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200 km/h
4
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4570 mm
1930
1845 mm
1790
1660 mm
2810
2660 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
10.5
14.9 Km/L
74
55 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
203 BHP
360
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
