Ciaz 1.5L GL vs K3 1.6L MPi Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 53638
QAR 71030
QAR 51589
QAR 68348
QAR 722
QAR 956
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 63
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 279
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3285
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1462 cc
1597 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4490 mm
4545 mm
1730 mm
1765 mm
1475 mm
1475 mm
2650 mm
2670 mm
480 L
544 L
160 m
160 m
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
11 Km/L
43 L
45 L
16.7 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
6
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard LCD
Android LCD
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
103 BHP
121 BHP
138 Nm
150 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓