Ciaz 1.5L GL vs Lincoln MKZ 2023 2.0L Select Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 53638
TBD
QAR 51589
TBD
QAR 722
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200
4
4
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4490 mm
4925
1730 mm
2116
1475 mm
1476
2650 mm
2850
480 L
436
160 m
/
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
13.9
43 L
62.5
16.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard LCD
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
103 BHP
250 BHP
138 Nm
389
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
