City 1.5L DX 2025 vs 6 Pure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 70054
QAR 88044
QAR 67370
QAR 84716
QAR 943
QAR 1185
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 56
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 240
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2920
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
4
1490 cc
2488 cc
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4553 mm
4870 mm
1748 mm
1840 mm
1476 mm
1450 mm
2650 mm
2830 mm
/
419 L
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
15 Km/L
40 L
62 L
13 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
119 BHP
185 BHP
145 Nm
250 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
