City 1.5L DX 2025 vs Jaguar XF 2023 2.0T S (250 PS) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 70054
TBD
QAR 67370
TBD
QAR 943
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 56
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 240
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2920
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
244
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4954
1748 mm
2091
1476 mm
1457
2650 mm
2960
/
540
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
14.7
40 L
74
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
247 BHP
145 Nm
365
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
