City 1.5L DX 2025 vs K3 1.6L MPi Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 70054
QAR 71030
QAR 67370
QAR 68348
QAR 943
QAR 956
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.55
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 53.2
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 59.85
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 228
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 256.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2774
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3120.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1490 cc
1597 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4553 mm
4545 mm
1748 mm
1765 mm
1476 mm
1475 mm
2650 mm
2670 mm
/
544 L
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
11 Km/L
40 L
45 L
13 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
4
119 BHP
121 BHP
145 Nm
150 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
