City 1.5L DX 2025 vs Peugeot 301 2013 1.6L VTi Active Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 70054
TBD
QAR 67370
TBD
QAR 943
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 56
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 240
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2920
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
188
4
3
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4442
1748 mm
1953
1476 mm
1466
2650 mm
2652
/
640
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
15.4
40 L
50
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
115 BHP
145 Nm
150
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
