Coolray GS vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 74294
QAR 245843
QAR 71466
QAR 236511
QAR 1000
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 330
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
GCC
GCC
/
210 km/h
/
3490 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4
5 Doors
4380
5115 mm
1800
1980 mm
1615
1920 mm
2600
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
10.25" TFT Screen
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Leather Wrapped
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
7
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Electric
/
Engine
1.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
271 BHP
290
385 Nm
91
/
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
