Coolray GS vs Tang L EV 670 Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 74294
TBD
QAR 71466
TBD
QAR 1000
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
17
/
4
/
4380
5040
1800
1996
1615
1760
2600
2950
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
10.25" TFT Screen
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather Wrapped
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
Transmission
7
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Electric
/
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
172 BHP
680 BHP
290
/
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
