Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs 212 Adventure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 112408
QAR 123402
QAR 108138
QAR 118706
QAR 1513
QAR 1661
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 254.2
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 349.53
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1590 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4590 mm
4705
1900 mm
1895
1685 mm
1936
2720 mm
2860
160 mm
235
/
2150
/
1598
/
1598
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
9.1
57 L
80
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
194 BHP
248 BHP
290 Nm
410
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
