E300 3.0L vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
QAR 449432
QAR 101045
QAR 432456
QAR 97225
QAR 6049
QAR 1360
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 330
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
195 km/h
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4949 mm
4885 mm
1880 mm
1840 mm
1480 mm
1445 mm
2961 mm
2824 mm
540 L
493 L
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
66 L
60 L
9 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
204 BHP
420 Nm
243 Nm
