GLC 200 4Matic vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 328248
QAR 245843
QAR 315839
QAR 236511
QAR 4418
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 12.95
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 90.65
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 362.6
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 284.9
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4726.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3713.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4656
5115 mm
1890
1980 mm
1639
1920 mm
2873
2890 mm
550
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
7.1
9.4 Km/L
66
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
211 BHP
271 BHP
350
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
