Groove 1.5L LT vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Good and convenient internal space distribution
Negative
- The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
- The quality of interior details needs improvement
- Insufficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 72730
TBD
QAR 69950
TBD
QAR 979
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 13
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 91
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 403
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4745
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4500 mm
4385
/
1875
/
1850
/
2560
/
500
Fuel Economy
16.1 Km/L
7.7
16.1 Km/L
/
/
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
184 BHP
147 Nm
303
Technologies
/
✓
