H9 Mid vs Coolray 2025 GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Price Comparison
QAR 123401
QAR 78224
QAR 118701
QAR 75216
QAR 1661
QAR 1053
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 184.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1477 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4950 mm
4380 mm
1930 mm
1810 mm
1960 mm
1615 mm
2800 mm
2600 mm
750 L
330 L
/
17
/
4 Doors
/
180 mm
Fuel Economy
/
16 Km/L
90 L
45 L
9.1 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
12.3
8
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
214
172 BHP
380 Nm
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
