Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 150821
QAR 77263
QAR 145103
QAR 74315
QAR 2030
QAR 1040
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.48
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 53.2
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 45.33
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 212.8
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 181.3
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2774
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2363.38
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
43 L
Dimensions
3
2 Seater
2360
/
16
/
5915
4045 mm
1950
1665 mm
2280
1930 mm
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
/
/
options.4,050 L
/
050 L
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
14.3 Km/L
70
43 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
174
96 BHP
450
134 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
134 Nm
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
