Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 118126
QAR 77263
QAR 113627
QAR 74315
QAR 1590
QAR 1040
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 349.53
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 222.43
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
43 L
Dimensions
3
2 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
4045 mm
1950
1665 mm
1990
1930 mm
3210
/
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
options.4,050 L
/
050 L
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
14.3 Km/L
70
43 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
277
96 BHP
351
134 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Motor
/
134 Nm
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
