LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 66492
QAR 102004
QAR 63957
QAR 98118
QAR 895
QAR 1373
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 222.43
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 317.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
1230
/
14
/
4045
5265 mm
1665
1950 mm
1930
1990 mm
2650
3210 mm
2000
/
4.9m
/
2075 - 1495 - 1305
/
3.4m³
/
770
/
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
9.9 Km/L
43
65 L
/
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
5-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Coil Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
165R14C
/
165R14C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
96.5
277 BHP
134
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
