Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 349.53
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
240 km/h
6
6
/
3492 cc
/
Japanese
Dimensions
7 Seater
8 Seater
5100
5350 mm
1994
2030 mm
1756
1955 mm
3010
3075 mm
566
836 L
/
5 Doors
/
253 m
Fuel Economy
9.1
/
/
97 L
/
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
14.3
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
425 BHP
500
700 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
