Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 75400
QAR 245843
QAR 72500
QAR 236511
QAR 1015
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 330
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.275
5115 mm
1.765
1980 mm
1.535
1920 mm
2.570
2890 mm
240
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
15.4
9.4 Km/L
48
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
6
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
148 BHP
271 BHP
192
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
