Nissan Juke 2024 1.0T vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
QAR 245843
TBD
QAR 236511
TBD
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 341
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
210 km/h
3
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4210
5115 mm
1800
1980 mm
1595
1920 mm
2636
2890 mm
251
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
52
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
271 BHP
180
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
