Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 227651
QAR 139230
QAR 219053
QAR 133947
QAR 3064
QAR 1874
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 338.25
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 307.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5046
4760 mm
1975
1930 mm
1795
1927 mm
2900
2750 mm
470
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.4
10 Km/L
74
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
224 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
387 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
