Okavango 2025 GK vs Coolray 2025 GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Price Comparison
QAR 104977
QAR 78224
QAR 100983
QAR 75216
QAR 1413
QAR 1053
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 307.5
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 184.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1477 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
17
5 Doors
4 Doors
4860 mm
4380 mm
1910 mm
1810 mm
1770 mm
1615 mm
2825 mm
2600 mm
257 L
330 L
194 mm
180 mm
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
16 Km/L
52 L
45 L
10 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
3.5
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
PVC Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Single
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Bucket
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
218
172 BHP
325 Nm
290 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
