Peugeot 301 2016 Access vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
TBD
QAR 101045
TBD
QAR 97225
TBD
QAR 1360
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
188
195 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4442
4885 mm
1748
1840 mm
1477
1445 mm
2655
2824 mm
640
493 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.4
14.9 Km/L
50
60 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
204 BHP
150
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Exterior
/
✓
