CarteaCompare CarsPeugeot 301 2016 Allure vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP)

Peugeot 301 2016 Allure vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Reliability and durability of high performance
  • Riding comfort and roomy interior design
  • Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs

Negative

  • Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
  • Traditional exterior and interior design
  • Lack of sportsmanship in control

Price Comparison

TBD

QAR 101045

TBD

QAR 97225

TBD

QAR 1360

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 6

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 7

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 42

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 49

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 180

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 210

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2190

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2555

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

188

195 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4442

4885 mm

1748

1840 mm

1477

1445 mm

2655

2824 mm

640

493 L

/

4 Doors

Fuel Economy

15.4

14.9 Km/L

50

60 L

/

14.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

115 BHP

204 BHP

150

243 Nm

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | Peugeot 301 2016 Allure

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan SE

Peugeot | Peugeot 301 2016 Allure

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2015 W12

Peugeot | Peugeot 301 2016 Allure

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2017 T6 Insciption Exclusive

Peugeot | Peugeot 301 2016 Allure

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan S

Peugeot | Peugeot 301 2016 Allure

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2017 T6 Inscription Plus

Peugeot Related Car

Toyota Related Car